Brooks C17 Carved Cambium All Weather
104,95
Fizik Tempo Argo R5
74,95
Fizik Antares R3
109,95
Brooks C17 Carved Cambium All Weather vs. Fizik Tempo Argo R5 vs. Fizik Antares R3
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
Comfort (5x) |
Aesthetics (3x) |
Very comfortable (2x) |
Comodita (2x) |
comfort (13x) |
Comfortable (9x) |
Price (6x) |
looks tight (4x) |
comfort (5x) |
Lightweight (2x) |
Look (2x) |
Sleek (2x) |
Cons
No (5x) |
Weight (3x) |
Hardness takes some getting used to |
Pricey |
No (10x) |
Hard (3x) |
Price (2x) |
None so far (2x) |
No (4x) |
price (2x) |
Rigid |
High price |
According to the product specialist
Pros
This saddle is comfortable and suitable for many types of cyclists. |
This saddle easily handles bad weather conditions. |
The cut out removes the pressure from the sensitive parts. |
This saddle is excellent value for money. |
This saddle is ideal for long-distance riders. |
The short design and large cutout relieve pressure on sensitive areas. |
The nylon saddle shell is reinforced with carbon. As such, it is less likely to deform and will last longer. |
The carbon shell means the saddle will retain its shape for longer. |
The Wing Flex makes the saddle a little friendlier to the inside of your thighs. |
Cons
This saddle belongs in the more heavy range. |
This saddle is less performance orientated than the Fizik Vento Argo R5. |
-
Specifications
Saddle Type
Road
MTB
Gravel
Touring
City & E-Bike
MTB
Gravel
Touring
City & E-Bike
Road
Road
MTB
MTB
Yes
Yes
No
Cover material
Leatherette
Leatherette
Leatherette
Rail Material
Steel
Aluminium
Aluminium
I move a bit
I move a lot
I move a bit
7 x 7 mm
7 x 7 mm
7 x 7 mm
464 gram
245 grams
205 grams
Saddle Width
164 mm
150 mm
160 mm
160 mm
140 mm
152 mm Regular
152 mm Regular
145-159 mm
115-129 mm
130-144 mm
130-144 mm
115-129 mm
130-144 mm
130-144 mm
Knee
Knee
Shin
Shin
Shin
Toe
Toe
Colour
Black
Black
Good
Better
Best
3 times per week or more
2 times per week
3 times per week or more