Garmin HRM 600
159,95
Wahoo TRACKR HR
79,95
Garmin HRM 600 vs. Wahoo TRACKR HR
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
rechargeable (5x) |
Accurate (2x) |
waterproof (2x) |
Works as it should. |
rechargeable (3x) |
good product |
fast delivery |
Sits comfortably |
Cons
no (2x) |
expensive purchase |
Does not fit old tyre |
Takes some getting used to the first time |
no |
Manual unclear |
does not read properly at all |
zero stars |
According to the product specialist
Pros
| The HRM 600 records heart rate, HRV and running dynamics such as ground contact time and vertical oscillation. |
| The HRM also works without a smartwatch and syncs your workout directly with the Garmin Connect app. |
| The device is very comfortable to wear thanks to the soft, flexible strap that is available in two different sizes. |
| With a 5 ATM water resistance rating, it is also suitable for swimming and rainy conditions. |
| The rechargeable battery lasts up to two months and can be easily recharged via USB. |
| The Wahoo TRACKR Heart Rate heart rate monitor is charged via USB-C and has a battery life up to 100 hours! |
| With its IPX7 waterproofing you can count on reliable heart rate data, even during rainy weather or sweaty training sessions. |
| With its ANT+ and Multi-Bluetooth, you can connect this heart rate monitor to up to three different devices at once! |
| Features LED-indicators to keep you updated on its battery status. |
Cons
| For extensive running dynamics, the HRM 600 must be paired with a compatible smartwatch. |
| Battery life is shorter than in models with replaceable batteries, such as the HRM 200. |
| This heart rate monitor isn't suitable for under water use. |
Specifications
5 ATM
IPX7
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Colour
Black
Black
60 cm - 85 cm
80 cm - 119 cm
80 cm - 119 cm
67 cm - 127 cm
Yes
Yes
Chest Strap
Chest Strap