BBB Cycling Select Optic PH
86,35
Oakley Radar EV Prizm Road
167,68
Oakley Sutro Lite Prizm Road
147,35
BBB Cycling Select Optic PH vs. Oakley Radar EV Prizm Road vs. Oakley Sutro Lite Prizm Road
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
Fit (4x) |
Lightweight (4x) |
Design (2x) |
quality (2x) |
Indispensable while cycling |
Beautiful design |
Fit |
Comfort |
Cons
-
Prijs (4x) |
Firmly priced (2x) |
stable light transmission values |
duration |
No. (5x) |
Doesn't get any faster |
Pricey but worth it |
Have to push it back on my nose occasionally |
According to the product specialist
Pros
Perfect sports glasses for people who wear glasses. |
The photochromatic lens is self-tinting so that you no longer have to change lenses. |
The Prizm Road lens creates a contrast-enhancing effect, making it easier to distinguish colours. |
The wider lens of the Radar EV provides a better and larger field of view. |
The new 'surge ports' preserve the cool airflow. |
The frame is lightweight and durable as it is made from Oakley's own O-Matter. |
Thanks to its light transmittance of only 20%, the Prizm Road lens is suitable for sunny days. |
The Sutro Lite has a semi-rimless frame for a greater field of view. |
The frame is made of O-Matter material, which provides durability and low weight. |
The Unobtainium in the nose pads and legs ensures a secure fit. |
The Prizm Road lens can be used when cycling in sunny daylight and in the shade. |
Cons
These glasses come without prescription lenses. Please contact your optician to order these. |
Changing the lenses takes some practice and may require some time the first few times. |
While the Prizm Road lens is Oakley's all-round lens, it may be too dark for use in the forest. |
Specifications
Path
Fotochromatic
Contrast
Contrast
Half frame
Half frame
Half frame
Frame Colour
Black
Polished White
Matte Black
Number of lenses
1 lens
1 lens
1 lens
Lens Colour
Photochromic
Prizm Road
Prizm Road
Yes, with extra insert
No
No
17 - 85%
20%
20%
Slightly cloudy
Slightly cloudy
Slightly cloudy