Reviews over the
Schwalbe Aerothan MTB

Schwalbe Aerothan MTB
3.9 / 5
Average from 22 reviews
5
11 reviews
4
6 reviews
3
0 reviews
2
1 review
1
4 reviews

4 / 5

The best alternative to tubeless

- Daan, 18 April, 2025

I have been riding Aerothan tyres and their predecessors (EVO tubes made from Aerothan) for years. These newer Aerothan tyres are super lightweight (92 g for 29 inches instead of the specified 87 g). You can also ride with low pressure due to their shape retention and these tubes have low rolling resistance. In short, the best alternative to tubeless. Only disadvantage is that after 2-3 years or so, the inner valve comes out of the shaft and the valve is no longer reliable (leaks slightly). The tyre then needs replacing.

Pros & Cons

Low rolling resistance
Ride with low tension
Super lightweight
Unreliable valve after 2-3 years
Automatic translation

1 / 5

Full plastic threads are light but not durable.

- Ben, 14 January, 2025

Unfortunately, this proved unsuccessful. Thread of the valve core did not stay in the valve after a few pumps. Probably the plastic threads are not as strong as those made of metal/alu.

Pros & Cons

All-plastic threads turn quickly.
Automatic translation

1 / 5

Worthless

- Jan, 18 November, 2024

After 2 rides, the tyre was taken out and inflated, but the inner tube remained hard and went through a water tank, so there was no puncture.

Pros & Cons

Runs empty
Automatic translation

5 / 5

All highly recommended

- Christian, 31 October, 2024

Aerothan hoses have an enormous weight advantage over conventional hoses, but are still very puncture-proof. A little tip on the weak point: I glue the plastic valve seat with Loctide, otherwise it sometimes leaks.

Automatic translation

5 / 5

Top product

- Michael, 31 October, 2024

It's an alternative to tubeless. I used to have tubeless, but it's time-consuming and clogs everything up, especially the valve. That's why an Aerothane tube is the best alternative

Automatic translation

4 / 5

Fine alternative to tubeless, more durable, less lubrication

- Bram, 13 October, 2024

Rides very pleasantly

Pros & Cons

Durable
Lightweight, same handling as tubeless
No quick punctures
Careful fitting
Price
Automatic translation

4 / 5

This is how high-tech helps.

- Jürgen, 11 September, 2024

I am glad that this article with its positive properties is on the market.

Automatic translation

5 / 5

Nice alternative to tubeless

- Rene, 24 August, 2024

Nice so far

Pros & Cons

Light
Pleasant ride
Awkward to mount
Automatic translation

4 / 5

Very light inner tube

- Roel, 6 April, 2024

This inner tube is really tremendously light. Cycling experience is good.

Pros & Cons

Almost 2 x 100 grams less than traditional tyre
Very easy to fit
Very light
Automatic translation

4 / 5

All in all, a good hose

- Sascha, 12 March, 2024

The weight is great. But I had a slow puncture after the first 5 kilometres. A thorn pierced through the tyre and the inner tube. The inner tube can only be repaired with special patches. For the price, two patches could be included.

Automatic translation

5 / 5

Really good product

- Rudi, 7 November, 2023

mega light and easy to mount and with the tube it rolls much better

Automatic translation

5 / 5

Nice alternative to tubeless

- Rob, 13 October, 2023

Fitted the Aerothan after puncture-ridden conventional interior in French Provence. Used for the first time. Had two Aerothans with me because they fit easily in the SWAT box. Was fiddling a bit with the valve because it is short and cannot be secured with a screw. This causes you to push the valve inwards (depending on pump type). Otherwise, the impression is very good. Saves more than 100 Gram with normal inside. In my experience, this could be felt in riding. Tyre maintains its pressure and has not been punctured so far (under unfriendly conditions). Price just about acceptable due to hefty discount from Mantel.

Pros & Cons

Compact
Strong
Super light
Pricey
Short valve
Automatic translation

5 / 5

Excellent product

- Jacques, 19 October, 2022

Excellent, lightweight chamber for improved comfort and bike handling

Pros & Cons

Flexibility
Little loss of pressure
No punctures after several hundred km
Weight
Price
Repair if punctured
Automatic translation

5 / 5

Very fast hoses, just great. Top quality.

- Martin, 30 June, 2021

Rolls absolutely super, huge difference to the normal hoses. My expectations have been completely exceeded. Very easy to mount. You can ride with very low air pressure (29 inch CC bike).

Pros & Cons

Assembly super
Very light
Automatic translation

1 / 5

The worst invention since man invented the wheel

- Mirko, 28 June, 2021

Useless is putting it mildly, on my first bike ride in the neighbourhood (98% asphalt, 2% park) I got a puncture. I hope the patch holds.

Automatic translation

1 / 5

Bad product

- Francesco, 21 June, 2021

They puncture easily and if you try to repair them, the adhesive patch does not hold.

Pros & Cons

Weight
Cost
Easily punctured
Not repairable
Automatic translation

5 / 5

highly recommended

- Alessandro, 2 June, 2021

easy to assemble, so far no punctures on the usual 'cursed' route. feeling of greater fluidity in pedalling

Pros & Cons

lightness
robustness
simplicity of assembly
does not fit perfectly on the rim
Automatic translation

5 / 5

Smooth and compact

- Dragos, 22 May, 2021

I've got it as a spare tube in case my tubeless tires fail. It's small, lightweight and seems very durable.

Pros & Cons

Compact
Lightweight

2 / 5

technology is top, valve is brol

- Mick, 22 May, 2021

ridden with it for four weeks, start fine, but after re-pumping several times, valve starts leaking, not very reliable, or got a Monday copy,....;

Pros & Cons

light
valve quality
Automatic translation

5 / 5

Excellent inner tube

- John, 21 March, 2021

Taking a spare tyre with you is easier because of the packing size, no problem with putting it on and weight also makes a difference

Pros & Cons

Light
None so far
Automatic translation

4 / 5

They fall smaller than 29".

- Joost, 5 February, 2021

Tricky to fit because they are smaller than the outer tyre. The job is similar to a 26" latex and a 29" outer tyre. As for longevity, I've only just started using them. So I don't know that yet.

Pros & Cons

Time will tell.
Tricky editing.
Automatic translation

5 / 5

The alternative to tubeless without dirty hands.

- Remco, 24 January, 2021

If you like to cycle with a slightly lower tyre pressure in your (mtb) tyres, tubeless is often the way to go. Advantages: lower tyre pressure means more comfort and grip and better resistance to punctures. Disadvantages: you need to put a sealant in your tyres which often results in a deddle and, in case of large holes, a bi-tire often needs to be put in en route. These disadvantages in particular often cause annoyance. The Aerothan bi-band solves these drawbacks very quickly. You use the Aerothan exactly as you would use a normal inner tube, but because the Aerothan is much stronger, it has the same advantages as a tubeless system; i.e. it can be ridden with a low pressure, it is more resistant to punctures, etc. Before people start saying "I'm not going back to those old-fashioned inner tubes", I took the liberty of comparing. The amount of sealant needed for your wheels is heavier than 2 Aerothon inner tubes. Especially when it comes to mtb tyres. And then the plastic valve is the heaviest part of the Aerothon inner tube..... Sure, you can still puncture with it. Just like with any other system. It's still a pneumatic tyre, after all. But as an alternative to sticky junk that has to go into your tyres, rim strips that sometimes take on a life of their own and loose valves that don't always seal as well, the Aerothan is excellent alternative.

Pros & Cons

Easy to fit.
LIGHT! VERY LIGHT!
Same riding characteristics as tubeless.
Perhaps a bit pricey (still).
Automatic translation