Oakley Jawbreaker Prizm Low Light
135,15
Oakley Radar EV Prizm Field
142,26
Oakley Radar EV Prizm Road
167,68
Oakley Jawbreaker Prizm Low Light vs. Oakley Radar EV Prizm Field vs. Oakley Radar EV Prizm Road
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
Light (3x) |
Comfortable (3x) |
Brand |
Lens optics |
Fit (4x) |
Lightweight (4x) |
quality (2x) |
Sits well (2x) |
Cons
-
None (3x) |
Fogged |
Arm length |
Delicate lens |
Prijs (4x) |
Firmly priced (2x) |
stable light transmission values |
duration |
According to the product specialist
Pros
Its high light transmittance makes the Prizm Low Light an ideal lens for in dark forests or when the sun sets early. |
The Prizm lens offers you optimal colour contrast. |
Wide lens offering ample eye protection. |
The Prizm lens ensures an optimal view by improving the colour contrast. |
Larger lens compared to the older Radar so you won't look at the frame anymore. |
Accessories like lenses and earsocks are available to give your glasses an upgrade. |
The Prizm Road lens creates a contrast-enhancing effect, making it easier to distinguish colours. |
The wider lens of the Radar EV provides a better and larger field of view. |
The new 'surge ports' preserve the cool airflow. |
The frame is lightweight and durable as it is made from Oakley's own O-Matter. |
Thanks to its light transmittance of only 20%, the Prizm Road lens is suitable for sunny days. |
Cons
Not very suitable for sunny days. |
Heavy build not suited for narrow-shaped heads. |
Swapping lenses takes a little practice. |
Changing the lenses takes some practice and may require some time the first few times. |
Specifications
Pitch
Path
Contrast
Contrast
Contrast
Full frame
Half frame
Half frame
Frame Colour
Polished White
Polished Black
Polished White
Number of lenses
1 lens
1 lens
1 lens
Lens Colour
Prizm Low Light
Prizm Field
Prizm Road
No
No
No
75%
15%
20%
Slightly cloudy
Shady or cloudy
Shady or cloudy
Sunny conditions
Slightly cloudy