Oakley Jawbreaker Fire Iridium
133,11
Oakley Sutro Prizm Road
139,21
Oakley Radar EV Prizm Road
167,68
Oakley Jawbreaker Fire Iridium vs. Oakley Sutro Prizm Road vs. Oakley Radar EV Prizm Road
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
Comfortable (3x) |
Fit (2x) |
Lens (2x) |
Light (2x) |
Fit (4x) |
Lightweight (4x) |
Design (2x) |
quality (2x) |
Cons
-
Price (2x) |
May be a little too wide |
coating is fragile |
No |
Prijs (4x) |
Firmly priced (2x) |
stable light transmission values |
duration |
According to the product specialist
Pros
Large lens offering ample eye protection. |
Iridium lens filtering sun glare reflecting off water for example. |
Separate lenses available for order. |
These cycling glasses have a nice big frame to protect a larger part of your face against the elements. |
The Prizm Road lens technology improves your view by effectively reducing the light transmittance. |
The rubber nose pads keep the glasses securely in place. |
The Prizm Road lens creates a contrast-enhancing effect, making it easier to distinguish colours. |
The wider lens of the Radar EV provides a better and larger field of view. |
The new 'surge ports' preserve the cool airflow. |
The frame is lightweight and durable as it is made from Oakley's own O-Matter. |
Thanks to its light transmittance of only 20%, the Prizm Road lens is suitable for sunny days. |
Cons
Heavy build that doesn't fit narrow head shapes very well. |
The frame of these cycling glasses is quite wide, which may not be to everyone's liking. |
Changing the lenses takes some practice and may require some time the first few times. |
Specifications
Path
Coating
Contrast
Contrast
Full frame
Full frame
Half frame
Frame Colour
Crystal Clear
Matte Black
Polished White
Number of lenses
1 lens
1 lens
1 lens
Lens Colour
Fire Iridium
Prizm Road
Prizm Road
No
No
No
16%
20%
20%
Sunny conditions
Slightly cloudy
Slightly cloudy
No