Cycplus H1
30,44
Wahoo Tickr Fit
71,95
Polar Verity Sense
81,22
Cycplus H1 vs. Wahoo Tickr Fit vs. Polar Verity Sense
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
Price (4x) |
rechargeable with usb |
simple zone registration |
zone monitoring heart rate |
Rechargeable (4x) |
Accurate (2x) |
Carrying comfort (2x) |
convenient around the arm |
Does not feel it |
Long battery life |
Accurate data |
Comfortable |
Cons
No (2x) |
no heart rate value display |
no programmable zone |
attached to upper arm, not to wrist |
Service from Mantel |
Oxidises quickly |
Still vulnerable to moisture |
Service from Wahoo |
Less accurate at short intervals than chest strap |
According to the product specialist
Pros
-
| The Wahoo Tickr Fit has a rechargeable battery; when fully charged, it lasts up to 30 hours. |
| With the Tickr Fit and the Wahoo Fitness app you can easily access your training data. |
| The Wahoo Tickr Fit has been designed to be worn around the arm, so it doesn't have a chest strap. |
| Bluetooth connectivity allows you to connect the Wahoo Tickr Fit with most smartphones. |
| Ultimate freedom of movement as you can wear this heart rate monitor around your arm. |
| Accurate and reliable heart rate data thanks to optical heart rate technology. |
| Seamless connectivity via Bluetooth and ANT+ up to 150 metres range. |
| Long battery life of up to 30 hours and ample storage capacity for offline workouts. |
| Water resistance to 50 metres for worry-free swimming. |
Cons
-
| The average battery life of 30 hours is less than that of traditional heart rate sensors with a chest strap and button battery. |
| Available in one size, suitable for an arm circumference of 23 to 32 centimetres. |
| Less accurate than chest strap heart rate monitors, such as the Polar H10, for example. |
Specifications
IP67
IPX7
WR50
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Colour
Black
Black
Yes
Yes
Yes
Bracelet
Bracelet
Bracelet