Time IClic Carboflex
60.10
Look Keo 2 Max
68.70
Look Keo 2 Max Carbon
81.50
Time IClic Carboflex vs. Look Keo 2 Max vs. Look Keo 2 Max Carbon
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
Price (12x) |
Low weight (9x) |
Quality (7x) |
Solid (5x) |
Lightweight (16x) |
Light (13x) |
Price (12x) |
Quality (7x) |
Cons
-
No (6x) |
Maybe a little heavier? (2x) |
Not the lightest |
Snap in on one side |
No (15x) |
nothing (3x) |
The non-slip bits on the plates come off quickly |
difficult to screw on |
According to the product specialist
Pros
-
This pedal is comfortable and geared to long distance cycling. |
This pedal offers efficient power transmission during cycling. |
The conical bearing has good durability. |
The steel inserts reduce surface wear. |
These carbon pedals are light-weight, stiff, comfortable and very much suited to long distance work. |
These pedals have a large contact area. Improving power transmission and reducing foot strain. |
The inserts on the pedal body slow down wear. |
The cup & cone bearings in these pedals are very durable. |
With the adjustable spring tension you can decide how hard you want to click out. |
Cons
-
This pedal has a composite body and is therefore less stiff and heavier than the Look Keo 2 Max carbon. |
This pedal is more focused on endurance than performance, and therefore less suitable for the competition rider. |
This pedal is less aerodynamic than the Look Keo Blade pedal. |
Specifications
Power Meter
No
No
Pedal Axle Material
Chromoly Steel
Chromoly Steel
Chromoly Steel
Body Material
Carbon
Composite
Composite
Composite
Carbon
Cleats included
Yes
Yes
Yes
3-point mount
3-point mount
3-point mount
One-sided
One-sided
Click-fit mechanism
One side
Industrial Bearing
Cup & Cone
Needle Bearing
Needle Bearing
Cup & Cone
Needle Bearing
Needle Bearing
Yes
Yes
15°
15°
15°
222 grams
260 gram
250 grams
Normal
Colour
White
Red
Red
Black
Black
Time IClic / Xpresso
Look Kéo
Look Kéo
Best
Better
Better