Nederland
België
Deutschland
United Kingdom
Finland
Ireland
Luxembourg
Portugal
Poland
Österreich
France
España
Italia
Sverige
Danmark
Time IClic Carboflex
60.10
Shimano 105 R7000
90.10
Look Keo 2 Max
68.70
Time IClic Carboflex vs. Shimano 105 R7000 vs. Look Keo 2 Max
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
light (9x) |
Price (5x) |
Good quality (5x) |
Solid (4x) |
Price (12x) |
Low weight (9x) |
Quality (7x) |
Solid (5x) |
Cons
-
No (12x) |
Pricey (3x) |
Sometimes a little difficult to engage |
Material |
No (6x) |
Maybe a little heavier? (2x) |
Not the lightest |
Snap in on one side |
According to the product specialist
Pros
-
| The Shimiano 105 R7000 pedal is very durable and runs smoothly. |
| This pedal has a large contact surface, improving your pedal efficiency. |
| By using a carbon composite pedal body, this pedal is very stiff and relatively light. |
| This pedal is comfortable and geared to long distance cycling. |
| This pedal offers efficient power transmission during cycling. |
| The conical bearing has good durability. |
| The steel inserts reduce surface wear. |
Cons
-
| The bearings in the pedal axle are not as well sealed as in higher-end pedals. This causes the bearings to wear out more quickly. |
| This pedal has a composite body and is therefore less stiff and heavier than the Look Keo 2 Max carbon. |
| This pedal is more focused on endurance than performance, and therefore less suitable for the competition rider. |
Specifications
Power Meter
No
No
Pedal Axle Material
Chromoly Steel
Steel
Chromoly Steel
Body Material
Carbon
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Cleats included
Yes
Yes
Yes
3-point mount
3-point mount
3-point mount
One-sided
One-sided
Click-fit mechanism
One side
Industrial Bearing
Cup & Cone
Cup & Cone
Needle Bearing
Needle Bearing
Yes
Yes
15°
15°
222 grams
258 grams
260 gram
Normal
Colour
White
Red
Red
Black
Black
Time IClic / Xpresso
Shimano SPD-SL
Look Kéo
Best
Better
Better