Giro Source MIPS
111,77
Bell 4Forty MIPS
110,75
Oakley DRT5 MIPS
60,99
Giro Source MIPS vs. Bell 4Forty MIPS vs. Oakley DRT5 MIPS
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
Fit (6x) |
Weight (4x) |
good fit (4x) |
comfortable (3x) |
Price (6x) |
Fit (5x) |
Comfortable (4x) |
Mips (4x) |
Price |
Fit |
Quality |
Finish |
Cons
Bit on the heavy side. |
No downsides so far |
None found |
Straps are a bit stiff |
None (2x) |
None to date |
Actually not provisional |
Very short strap |
-
According to the product specialist
Pros
The In-Mold construction increases protection and reduces weight. |
Thanks to MIPS fall protection, the lateral and rotational forces of a fall are better absorbed. |
The Roc Loc 5 adjustment system can be used to create a perfect fit. |
The front visor can be adjusted to suit the conditions. |
There are 17 vents for good ventilation. |
MIPS absorbs the impact of a fall effectively for increased protection. |
The Sweat Guide padding wicks away moisture effectively, keeping your head nice and dry. |
With the Float Fit system you can adjust the fit perfectly for high wearing comfort. |
The innovative Eyewear Landing Zone allows you to securely store cycling glasses. |
The washable silicone gel pad in front keeps your head free from sweat. |
The BOA system alows you to minutely adjust the helmet's fit. |
The TX1 Lace retention system reduces temple pressure. |
The MIPS layer better absorbs lateral and rotational impact force, reducing the chance of brain damage. |
Cons
The MIPS protection structure makes this MTB helmet slightly heavier. |
This helmet has no camera or light mount. |
This helmet is relatively heavy compared to similar MTB helmets. |
Specifications
Trail / Enduro
Trail / Enduro
Trail / Enduro
341 grams
350 grams
441 grams
Yes, MIPS
Yes, MIPS
Yes, MIPS
S
M
L
XL
M
L
XL
S
M
L
XL
M
L
XL
S
M
L
M
L
51 - 54 cm
52 - 55 cm
52 - 56 cm
Colour
Black
Green
Blue
Brown
Green
Blue
Brown
Black
Grey
Red
Grey
Red
Black
★★★☆
★★★☆
★★★☆
Helmet finish
Matte
Matte
Matte