Ritchey WCS True Grip
12,15
ESIgrips Fit XC
25,36
Ergon GS3
52,81
Ritchey WCS True Grip vs. ESIgrips Fit XC vs. Ergon GS3
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
Easy to assemble |
Light |
Weather or no weather, you always have continuous grip. |
Look beautiful. |
Nice and light |
Lots of grip |
Less tingling in my hands |
Easy to assemble |
Easy to adjust (2x) |
Fits perfectly. |
Easy to assemble. |
Easy assembly |
Cons
No (2x) |
Sore hands |
Wear off quickly |
Vulnerable |
Broke down on installation |
No (2x) |
According to the product specialist
Pros
The use of neoprene makes these grips very light and soft! |
The anatomical design fits the shape of your hands well. |
The Fit models are divided into 3 zones for optimal grip and control in various circumstances. |
The Fit XC grips are ESIgrips's thickest models and were designed for people with large hands. |
The grips weigh 65 grams. |
These grips offer improved grip and control. |
As you have better grip and control, it wil take longer for you to get tired. |
Cons
The anatomical design offers less comfort than ergonomic grips. |
Less suited for small-handed people. |
-
Specifications
Length
130 mm
130 mm
135 mm
Size
M
L
S
L
L
Diameter
32 mm
32 mm
34 mm
34 mm
Fit
Normal
Normal
Normal
Material
Foam
Silicone
Rubber
Colour
Black
Black
Green
Blue
Purple
Red
Orange
Pink
Brown
Green
Blue
Purple
Red
Orange
Pink
Brown
Black
Type
Ergonomic
Ergonomic
Ergonomic
Discipline
Cross-Country MTB
Cross-Country MTB
Cross-Country MTB
Better
Better
Best
Ergonomic
No
Yes
Yes
Medium
Medium
Much
Slide-On
Slide-On
Lock-On
Inside diameter
22.2 mm
22.2 mm
22.2 mm