Rogelli Bliss W
338,70
Rogelli Liona
From 135,50
Rogelli Lucette
From 156,10
Rogelli Bliss W vs. Rogelli Liona vs. Rogelli Lucette
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
Warm (2x) |
nice and warm |
braces |
zip at bottom leg |
Good chamois |
Not expensive |
Quality fabric |
Chamois is very comfortable |
Cons
-
No reflection |
Firm material |
Does not immediately fit like a glove |
Large sizes, could be even smaller |
chamois too thin |
not OK for long rides 60+km |
Material wears a bit |
According to the product specialist
Pros
The Bliss W Cycling pants is equipped with a seatpad geared to long distances. |
The warm fabric ensures the tights can be used at temperatures till below zero. |
The fleece lining makes this long bib tight comfortably warm. |
The zippers at the ankles make it very easy to put the tight on and take it off. |
As the Rogelli Liona has flat-stitched seams, you will not experience skin irritation during cycling. |
The flat stitch seams further improve wearer comfort. |
Improved visibility because of the reflective details on the tights. |
Cons
Not being wind-and waterproof, cold penetrates faster. |
The HPO3 seat pad is less suitable for long bike rides. |
No shoulder straps. |
Specifications
Sex
Women
Women
Women
180+ minutes
0-90 minutes
0-90 minutes
XS
S
M
L
XL
S
M
L
XL
S
M
L
XL
XXL
M
L
XL
XXL
S
M
L
XL
XXL
M
L
XL
XXL
No
No
No
Chamois
With Chamois
With Chamois
With Chamois
Colour
Black
Black
Black
Straps
Yes
Yes
No
23-25
26-28
29-31
32-34
35-37
26-28
29-31
32-34
35-37
26 - 28
26 - 28
Reflective elements
Yes
Yes
Yes
★★★☆☆
★★★☆☆
★★★★☆
- 0 °C
0 - 10 °C
0 - 10 °C
Not waterproof
Not waterproof
Not waterproof