Oakley Frogskins Prizm
454,70
Oakley Frogskins Lite Prizm Sapphire
484,00
Oakley Latch Beta Prizm Grey
596,00
Oakley Frogskins Prizm vs. Oakley Frogskins Lite Prizm Sapphire vs. Oakley Latch Beta Prizm Grey
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
-
-
Cons
-
-
-
According to the product specialist
Pros
Retro sunglasses with today's technologies. |
Prizm Tungsten lens significantly improves vision with its 14% light transmittance. |
Durable plastic material is very lightweight and ultra-comfortable. |
Retro sunglasses with today's technologies. |
Prizm Sapphire lens significantly improves vision with its 12% light transmittance. |
Durable plastic material is very lightweight and ultra-comfortable. |
Retro sunglasses with today's technologies. |
Significantly improves vision with its 17% light transmittance. |
Durable O-Matter material for incredibly long lifespan. |
Cons
Comes with a microbag, but no sturdy case. |
Comes with a microbag, but no sturdy case. |
No rubber nose piece, so the glasses could slide down your nose. |
Specifications
Contrast
Contrast
Prizm Grey
Frame Colour
Matte Tortoise
Matte Black
Matte Black
Lens Colour
Prizm Tungsten
Prizm Sapphire
Prizm Grey
14%
12%
17%
Sunny conditions
Sunny conditions
Sunny conditions