XLC Soft
31,00
Pro Ergo Sport
31,00
Ritchey WCS True Grip
53,20
XLC Soft vs. Pro Ergo Sport vs. Ritchey WCS True Grip
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
Thick, dense foam handle |
improved comfort |
Good value for money |
Comfortable |
Price |
Weight |
comfortable |
cheap |
Easy to assemble |
Light |
Weather or no weather, you always have continuous grip. |
Look beautiful. |
Cons
Nothing |
Mounting |
Handlebar plugs |
cannot make coffee with it |
No (2x) |
According to the product specialist
Pros
These grips have a high price-quality ratio. |
Because these grips are soft, you will cycle much more comfortable. |
These grips are good value for money. |
The use of neoprene makes these grips very light and soft! |
The anatomical design fits the shape of your hands well. |
Cons
Soft grips give less feedback from the ground, making them less suitable for performance-oriented cyclists. |
These grips do not provide as much support as ergonomic grips with a wide surface for your palm to rest on. |
The anatomical design offers less comfort than ergonomic grips. |
Specifications
Length
130 mm
130 mm
130 mm
Size
M
M
L
L
M
Diameter
22.2 mm
32 mm
34.5 mm
34.5 mm
32 mm
Fit
Normal
Normal
Normal
Material
Foam
Foam
Foam
Colour
Black
Black
Black
Type
Ergonomic
Ergonomic
Ergonomic
Discipline
Cross-Country MTB
Trekking
City
E-Bike
Trekking
City
E-Bike
Cross-Country MTB
Cross-Country MTB
Good
Good
Better
Ergonomic
Yes
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Slide-On
Slide-On
Slide-On
Inside diameter
22.2 mm
22.2 mm
22.2 mm