Nederland
België
Deutschland
United Kingdom
Finland
Ireland
Luxembourg
Portugal
Poland
Österreich
France
España
Italia
Sverige
Danmark
Fizik Tundra M5 Versus
338,70
Fizik Tempo Argo R5
333,10
Pro Falcon Flow
444,20
Fizik Tundra M5 Versus vs. Fizik Tempo Argo R5 vs. Pro Falcon Flow
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
comfort (13x) |
Comfortable (9x) |
Price (6x) |
looks tight (4x) |
price (6x) |
Design (4x) |
quality (3x) |
comfortable (2x) |
Cons
-
No (10x) |
Hard (3x) |
Price (2x) |
None so far (2x) |
No (5x) |
No negative minus points (2x) |
Pricey |
More rides needed to get used to it |
According to the product specialist
Pros
| The damping of the saddle is excellent because of the nylon shell and cut-out. |
| The shape of the Tundra allows you to easily change position, enabling you to slide forward during a climb for instance. |
| This saddle is excellent value for money. |
| This saddle is ideal for long-distance riders. |
| The short design and large cutout relieve pressure on sensitive areas. |
| The nylon saddle shell is reinforced with carbon. As such, it is less likely to deform and will last longer. |
| This saddle offers great freedom of movement for agile cyclists. |
| The cut-out alleviates pressure to the sensitive parts. |
| The steel rails filter out vibrations well. |
Cons
-
| This saddle is less performance orientated than the Fizik Vento Argo R5. |
| This saddle is less suitable for not so agile cyclists. |
Specifications
Saddle Type
MTB
Road
Road
MTB
MTB
Yes
Yes
Yes
Cover material
Leatherette
Leatherette
Leatherette
Rail Material
Aluminium
Aluminium
Stainless Steel
I do not move
I move a lot
I do not move
7 x 7 mm
7 x 7 mm
7 x 7 mm
247 grams
245 grams
209 grams
Saddle Width
125 mm
150 mm
160 mm
160 mm
132 mm
142 mm
142 mm
100-114 mm
115-129 mm
130-144 mm
130-144 mm
100-114 mm
115-129 mm
115-129 mm
Knee
Shin
Toe
Shin
Toe
Knee
Shin
Shin
Toe
Colour
Black
Black
Good
Better
Better
3 times per week or more
2 times per week
2 times per week