Look Keo Easy TdF
29.43
Look Keo Classic 3
42.64
Shimano Tiagra PD-R550
71.11
Look Keo Easy TdF vs. Look Keo Classic 3 vs. Shimano Tiagra PD-R550
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
price (6x) |
Fast delivery (3x) |
Good value for money (3x) |
weight (3x) |
Price (8x) |
Price/quality (6x) |
Fast delivery (6x) |
Easy to assemble (5x) |
Cons
-
No (9x) |
Soft spring on clips eve tightened |
Do not rotate like keo blades |
Engagement does not feel as good as keo blades |
None (13x) |
Higher weight (2x) |
there are no |
Why buy more expensive |
According to the product specialist
Pros
-
| The spring tension can be tuned with great precision, allowing you to finely adjust how easy it is to (dis)engage the pedal. |
| The large surface area under the cleat improves stability. |
| A lot lighter than its predecessor, the Look Keo Classic 2. |
| These pedals have a superb price-performance ratio. |
| This pedal provides more support than the RS500. This makes these pedals more suitable for experienced cyclists. |
| The larger contact surface improves pedalling efficiency. |
| A steel plate on the composite body increases durability. |
| The spring tension of these pedals can be adjusted using an Allen key. |
Cons
-
| This pedal is less tight when engaged, which makes it less suitable for fanatical cyclists and races. |
| These pedals are relatively heavy. |
| The bearings in these pedals are less durable than those in more expensive pedals. |
Specifications
Power Meter
No
No
Pedal Axle Material
Steel
Chromoly Steel
Chromoly Steel
Body Material
Composite
Composite
Composite
Cleats included
Yes
Yes
Yes
3-point mount
3-point mount
3-point mount
One-sided
One-sided
Click-fit mechanism
One side
Cup & Cone
Industrial Bearing
Cup & Cone
Yes
Yes
15°
15°
271 grams
307 grams
Tension
8 Nm
12 Nm
12 Nm
Normal
Normal
Colour
Black
Red
Black
Black
Black
Grey
Grey
Look Kéo
Look Kéo
Shimano SPD-SL
Good
Good
Good