Oakley Radar EV Advancer Photochromic
142.26
Oakley Jawbreaker Prizm Road
172.76
Oakley Radar EV Prizm Field
142.26
Oakley Radar EV Advancer Photochromic vs. Oakley Jawbreaker Prizm Road vs. Oakley Radar EV Prizm Field
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
Lens quality |
Look Pro |
Perfect for cloudy changing weather |
Comfortable (4x) |
light (3x) |
Stylish (2x) |
Great fit. (2x) |
Light (3x) |
Comfortable (3x) |
Brand |
Lens optics |
Cons
-
None (6x) |
Price. (3x) |
None so far (2x) |
Quite pricey for glasses |
None (3x) |
Fogged |
Arm length |
Delicate lens |
According to the product specialist
Pros
Even wider lens than the Radar EV for an even larger field of view. |
Photochromic lens adjust colour according to the light levels, eliminating the need for swapping lenses. |
Oakley's Field of View guarantees a large uninterrupted field of vision. |
The lens of the Jawbreaker is quite big, which ensures the best possible protection of your eyes. |
Thanks to the ventilation holes, the chance of the lens fogging up is small. |
The Prizm Road lens provides an optimal colour contrast in all conditions. |
The Prizm lens ensures an optimal view by improving the colour contrast. |
Larger lens compared to the older Radar so you won't look at the frame anymore. |
Accessories like lenses and earsocks are available to give your glasses an upgrade. |
Cons
The lowest 23% light transmittance level isn't dark enough for really bright sunlight. |
Although the Prizm Road lens is Oakley's all-round lens, at times it is too dark to see well during rides in the forest. |
As the Jawbreaker has a rather big design, it is not suitable for a narrower head shape. |
Swapping lenses takes a little practice. |
Specifications
Pitch
Photochromic
Contrast
Contrast
Half frame
Full frame
Half frame
Frame Colour
Matte Black
Polished White / Black
Polished Black
Number of lenses
1 lens
1 lens
1 lens
Lens Colour
Clear Black Iridium Photochromic
Prizm Road
Prizm Field
No
No
No
23 - 69%
20%
15%
Slightly cloudy
Slightly cloudy
Sunny conditions