Rogelli Artico
88.39
Craft Thermal Collant
81.27
AGU Essential Warm
25.41
Rogelli Artico vs. Craft Thermal Collant vs. AGU Essential Warm
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
Warm (7x) |
Nice and warm (3x) |
Lower leg zips (2x) |
Reasonable price |
warm (2x) |
Great fit |
Warm enough around freezing point |
multipurpose |
-
Cons
On the short side (2x) |
Not the most comfortable chamois |
Lining on stomach area is not breathable |
Crotch not windproof |
-
-
According to the product specialist
Pros
Suitable for cold wet winter days. |
Artico is provided with wind and water-repellent protected scrotch area. |
Equipped with a Comfort Gel pad, which is suitable for rides with a duration of up to four hours. |
The Thermo Brush material feels wonderfully soft and keeps your legs warm. |
The good breathability and moisture regulation prevents your legs from overheating. |
The materials used have resulted in a tight, elastic fit. |
As there is no seat pad, you can also use this thermal tight for skating. |
Good warm tights for dry circumstances with temperatures between 0 and 12 degrees. |
The pre shaped legs make you adapt a good cycle position. |
Cons
Even though it takes a long time for water to get through, it will happen eventually since it is not 100% waterproof. |
The absence of a seat pad reduces saddle comfort. |
The Green 95 pad sewn into the trousers is not well suited for long rides. |
Specifications
Sex
Men
Men
Men
180+ minutes
0-90 minutes
0-90 minutes
S
M
L
XL
XXL
3XL
M
L
XL
XXL
3XL
S
M
L
XL
XXL
M
L
XL
XXL
S
M
L
XL
XXL
M
L
XL
XXL
Yes
No
No
Chamois
With Chamois
Without Chamois
With Chamois
Colour
Black
Black
Black
Straps
Yes
Yes
Yes
27 - 29
27 - 29
27 - 29
30 - 32
33 - 35
36 - 38
39 - 41
30 - 32
33 - 35
36 - 38
39 - 41
Reflective elements
Yes
Yes
Yes
★★★☆☆
★★★☆☆
★★★★☆
- 0 °C
0 - 10 °C
0 - 12 °C
Splashproof
Not waterproof
Not waterproof