SRAM Guide Aluminium
14.18
Shimano L03A
From 23.33
SRAM Guide / Trail
From 20.28
SRAM Guide Aluminium vs. Shimano L03A vs. SRAM Guide / Trail
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
Good price (5x) |
Available! (5x) |
In stock (2x) |
Quiet (2x) |
efficient |
simple |
fast |
In dry conditions much better than sintered |
Cons
-
None (11x) |
expensive (2x) |
Pricey (2x) |
More expensive than third party pads |
No |
Unfortunately not in colour |
Wear resistance |
expensive |
According to the product specialist
Pros
Due to the aluminium backplate, these brake pads are more heat resistant than organic brake pads with a steel backplate. |
The brake pads are easy to dose and quick to engage. |
Heat dissipation is improved thanks to the cooling fins. |
These organic brake pads produce very little noise. |
These brake pads respond quickly and are easy to modulate. |
-
Cons
If you are going to make really long descents, these brake pads can lose braking power because of the heat that comes from braking. |
These pads wear out faster than harder pads. |
Although heat dissipation is improved due to the cooling fins, these resin brake pads are more sensitive to heat than brake pads with a (semi-)metallic compound. |
-
Specifications
Bike Type
Mountain bike
Road bike
Gravel bike
Gravel bike
Mountain bike
Soft (Resin/Organic)
Soft (Resin/Organic)
Hard (Metal)
Soft (Resin/Organic)
Soft (Resin/Organic)
Number of brake pads
1 Pair
1 Pair
2 Pairs
2 Pairs
1 Pair
2 Pairs
2 Pairs
SRAM A
Shimano G
SRAM A