Speedplay Zero Aero Stainless
247.02
Shimano Dura Ace R9100
From 188.01
Time XPRO 12 Carbon
182.92
Speedplay Zero Aero Stainless vs. Shimano Dura Ace R9100 vs. Time XPRO 12 Carbon
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
Weight (6x) |
Lightness (5x) |
Light weight (5x) |
Perfect (4x) |
Top pedal |
Low weight |
Easy to click in and out |
Cons
-
Nothing (6x) |
Price (5x) |
No (3x) |
expensive (3x) |
-
According to the product specialist
Pros
Aerodynamic advantage as the surface of the pedals integrate seamlessly with the walkable cleats. |
The angle at which you disengage from the pedals can be adjusted one degree at a time to suit your own preferences. |
The walkable cleats allow you to walk around on them without damaging the locking mechanism. |
Extremely lightweight, and the choice of many pro's. |
Not two, but three bearings per pedal. This allows it to run smoothly and last longer. |
Adjustable spring tension to determine how easy it is to (dis)engage the pedal. |
These pedals are very lightweight. |
These pedals offer excellent power transfer. |
Pressure on knees and other joints is reduced significantly due to Time's Bioposition technology. |
These pedals have an aerodynamic design. |
Cons
Replacing the cleats is expensive. |
Regularly require grease applied by the special Speedplay Grease Gun. |
The carbon body is more easily damaged in the event of an impact. |
As these pedals allow for a maximum rider weight of 90 kg, they are not suitable for all cyclists. |
Specifications
Power Meter
No
No
Type
2023
2024
2024
Pedal Axle Material
Stainless Steel
Stainless Steel
Titianium
Body Material
Composite
Carbon
Carbon
Cleats included
Yes
Yes
Yes
3-point mount
3-point mount
One-sided
One-sided
Click-fit mechanism
One side
Industrial Bearing
Needle Bearing
Needle Bearing
Cup & Cone
Needle Bearing
Needle Bearing
Industrial Bearing
No
Yes
Yes
0 - 15°
35°
16°
210 grams
234 grams
190 grams
Normal
4 mm
4 mm
Normal
Colour
Black
Black
Carbon Silver
Shimano SPD-SL
Time IClic / Xpresso
Best
Best
53 mm