BBB Cycling Commander PH
132,20
Oakley Radar EV Prizm Field
143,42
Oakley Jawbreaker Prizm Road
174,16
BBB Cycling Commander PH vs. Oakley Radar EV Prizm Field vs. Oakley Jawbreaker Prizm Road
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
Light (3x) |
Comfortable (3x) |
Brand |
Lens optics |
Comfortable (4x) |
light (3x) |
Stylish (2x) |
Great fit. (2x) |
Cons
-
None (3x) |
Fogged |
Arm length |
Delicate lens |
None (6x) |
Price. (3x) |
None so far (2x) |
Quite pricey for glasses |
According to the product specialist
Pros
Thanks to the photochromic lens you never have to change your lens again, it adapts to all weather types. |
The length of the arms can be adjusted in 3 steps, ensuring the best fit for everyone. |
The Prizm lens ensures an optimal view by improving the colour contrast. |
Larger lens compared to the older Radar so you won't look at the frame anymore. |
Accessories like lenses and earsocks are available to give your glasses an upgrade. |
Oakley's Field of View guarantees a large uninterrupted field of vision. |
The lens of the Jawbreaker is quite big, which ensures the best possible protection of your eyes. |
Thanks to the ventilation holes, the chance of the lens fogging up is small. |
The Prizm Road lens provides an optimal colour contrast in all conditions. |
Cons
-
Swapping lenses takes a little practice. |
Although the Prizm Road lens is Oakley's all-round lens, at times it is too dark to see well during rides in the forest. |
As the Jawbreaker has a rather big design, it is not suitable for a narrower head shape. |
Specifications
Pitch
Photochromic
Contrast
Contrast
Half frame
Half frame
Full frame
Frame Colour
Black
Polished Black
Polished White / Black
Number of lenses
1 lens
1 lens
1 lens
Lens Colour
Photohromic
Prizm Field
Prizm Road
No
No
No
17 - 85%
15%
20%
Slightly cloudy
Sunny conditions
Slightly cloudy