Nederland
België
Deutschland
United Kingdom
Finland
Ireland
Luxembourg
Portugal
Poland
Österreich
France
España
Italia
Sverige
Danmark
Time IClic Carboflex
70,71
Shimano Dura Ace R9100
From 189,54
Look Kéo Blade Carbon Ceramic
199,78
Time IClic Carboflex vs. Shimano Dura Ace R9100 vs. Look Kéo Blade Carbon Ceramic
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
Weight (6x) |
Lightness (5x) |
Light weight (5x) |
Perfect (4x) |
Weight (2x) |
Licht |
Strak vormgegeven |
Lightweight |
Cons
-
Nothing (6x) |
Price (5x) |
No (3x) |
expensive (3x) |
Er zitten geen 3 maar 2 sterktes veren bij |
Expensive |
Regrettably creaks when pushed hard |
Let's see in time... |
According to the product specialist
Pros
-
| Extremely lightweight, and the choice of many pro's. |
| Not two, but three bearings per pedal. This allows it to run smoothly and last longer. |
| Adjustable spring tension to determine how easy it is to (dis)engage the pedal. |
| The ceramic bearings let you pedal more smoothly, so more Watts are converted into speed! |
| The carbon body provides excellent power transmission and more control while cycling. |
| You can choose how tightly you are clicked in. |
| This pedal is relatively light! |
Cons
-
| The carbon body is more easily damaged in the event of an impact. |
| The pedals do not come with extra springs. |
Specifications
Power Meter
No
No
Pedal Axle Material
Chromoly Steel
Stainless Steel
Chromoly Steel
Body Material
Carbon
Composite
Composite
Carbon
Carbon
Cleats included
Yes
Yes
Yes
3-point mount
3-point mount
3-point mount
One-sided
One-sided
Click-fit mechanism
One side
Industrial Bearing
Cup & Cone
Needle Bearing
Needle Bearing
Ceramic
Yes
No, 12 Nm
15°
35°
0 - 15°
222 grams
234 grams
230 grams
Tension
12 Nm
Normal
4 mm
4 mm
Normal
Colour
White
Red
Red
Black
Grey
Time IClic / Xpresso
Shimano SPD-SL
Look Kéo
Best
Best
Best
53 mm