Castelli Nanoflex 2
64,51
AGU Essential
66,60
Rogelli Lugo Hightech 2.0
57,45
Castelli Nanoflex 2 vs. AGU Essential vs. Rogelli Lugo Hightech 2.0
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
Very comfortable and pretty waterproof |
Fit |
Form |
Comfort |
-
Sits wonderfully |
Fits well |
Chamois is comfortable even after 3 hours |
Good trousers |
Cons
None |
Come up small |
Expensive |
Chamois not as good as some. |
-
Not |
Chamois sits far back |
According to the product specialist
Pros
The fabric is water repellent. |
Lined with fleece for more warmth. |
Thanks to the preformed panels you can enjoy an optimal fit, without adversely affecting flexibility. |
The Flatlock seams ensure that the fabric leaves few to none imprints on the skin. |
The 10 cm thick padding provides a lot of comfort, that way these cycling bib shorts are also very suitable for medium distances. |
The padding is made of high quality Coolmax material, that ensures that perspiration is quickly removed. |
Thanks to the use of Rogelli Dynacool, the shorts are very elastic and that increases the comfort. |
Cons
The water repellent fabric is more rigid than ordinary Lycra. |
The padding used is less suitable for long bike rides. |
The seams of these shorts are stichted over the thigh, which can cause some irritation spots over time. |
Specifications
Sex
Men
Men
Men
90-180 minutes
90-180 minutes
90-180 minutes
S
M
L
XL
XXL
3XL
M
L
XL
XXL
3XL
S
M
L
XL
XXL
3XL
M
L
XL
XXL
3XL
S
M
L
XL
XXL
3XL
M
L
XL
XXL
3XL
No
Chamois
With Chamois
With Chamois
With Chamois
Colour
Black
Black
Black
Straps
Yes
Yes
Yes
Slim
Slim
Slim
25 - 26
27 - 29
30 - 32
33 - 35
36 - 38
39 - 41
27 - 29
30 - 32
33 - 35
36 - 38
39 - 41
27 - 29
30 - 32
33 - 35
36 - 38
39 - 41
42 - 44
30 - 32
33 - 35
36 - 38
39 - 41
42 - 44
30 - 32
18 - 25 °C
18 - 25 °C
Not waterproof
Not waterproof
Exact trouser leg length in CM
22.5 cm
Medium (22.5 - 24 cm)