AGU Bold Photochromic
86,98
Oakley Sutro Prizm Black
115,98
BBB Cycling Select Optic PH
82,14
AGU Bold Photochromic vs. Oakley Sutro Prizm Black vs. BBB Cycling Select Optic PH
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
Fine format |
Photochromatic works well |
Glasses very finely colored |
Good value for money |
Beautiful |
Great |
Sits well |
-
Cons
Bit sensitive at ears |
No |
Price |
-
According to the product specialist
Pros
The degree of light transmittance of the lens changes along with the light so that you don't have to change lenses. |
The anti-fog treatment makes the lens much less likely to fog up during cycling. |
The adjustable and anti-allergenic nose pad ensures a pleasant fit. |
The large frame protects a large part of the face. |
The Prizm Black lens has a light transmittance of 11% and is ideal for bright sunny days. |
The frame is made of O-Matter material, which makes the glasses lightweight and durable. |
Thanks to the Unobtainium nosepads, the glasses remain in place very well. |
Perfect sports glasses for people who wear glasses. |
The photochromatic lens is self-tinting so that you no longer have to change lenses. |
Cons
A photochromic lens is often slightly too light on bright summer days. |
The frame is quite large, which would have to suit your tastes. |
The Prizm Black lens is intended to be used on bright light conditions. It is too dark for other conditions. |
These glasses come without prescription lenses. Please contact your optician to order these. |
Specifications
Photochromic
Contrast
Fotochromatic
Full frame
Full frame
Half frame
Frame Colour
Black
Polished Black
Black
Number of lenses
1 lens
1 lens
1 lens
Lens Colour
Photochromic
Prizm Black
Photochromic
No
No
Yes, with extra insert
12,2 - 53,9%
11%
17 - 85%
Very sunny conditions
Sunny conditions
Slightly cloudy
Shady or cloudy
Sunny conditions
Slightly cloudy
Shady or cloudy
Sunny conditions
Slightly cloudy
No