Nederland
België
Deutschland
United Kingdom
Finland
Ireland
Luxembourg
Portugal
Poland
Österreich
France
España
Italia
Sverige
Danmark
Fizik Tundra M5 Versus
67,64
Fizik Tempo Argo R5
76,34
Pro Griffon GelFlow Inox
77,31
Fizik Tundra M5 Versus vs. Fizik Tempo Argo R5 vs. Pro Griffon GelFlow Inox
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
-
comfort (13x) |
Comfortable (9x) |
Price (6x) |
looks tight (4x) |
Comfortable (2x) |
fits comfortably |
sturdy |
Very comfortable |
Cons
-
No (10x) |
Hard (3x) |
Price (2x) |
None so far (2x) |
not that I know of |
Slightly heavier |
Recess could have been slightly larger |
Not the lightest |
According to the product specialist
Pros
| The damping of the saddle is excellent because of the nylon shell and cut-out. |
| The shape of the Tundra allows you to easily change position, enabling you to slide forward during a climb for instance. |
| This saddle is excellent value for money. |
| This saddle is ideal for long-distance riders. |
| The short design and large cutout relieve pressure on sensitive areas. |
| The nylon saddle shell is reinforced with carbon. As such, it is less likely to deform and will last longer. |
| Extra comfortable saddle due to the GelFlow padding. |
| This saddle can resist extreme weather due to the stainless steel rails. |
Cons
-
| This saddle is less performance orientated than the Fizik Vento Argo R5. |
| The saddle is relatively heavy due to the stainless steel saddle rails. |
Specifications
Saddle Type
MTB
Road
Road
MTB
MTB
Yes
Yes
Yes
Cover material
Leatherette
Leatherette
Leatherette
Rail Material
Aluminium
Aluminium
Stainless Steel
I do not move
I move a lot
I move a bit
7 x 7 mm
7 x 7 mm
7 x 7 mm
247 grams
245 grams
Saddle Width
125 mm
150 mm
160 mm
160 mm
142 mm
152 mm
152 mm
100-114 mm
115-129 mm
130-144 mm
130-144 mm
115-129 mm
130-144 mm
130-144 mm
Knee
Shin
Toe
Shin
Toe
Knee
Shin
Shin
Shin
Colour
Black
Black
Good
Better
Better
3 times per week or more
2 times per week
2 times per week