FSA SL-K
192,42
PRO PLT Carbon
174,00
PRO Vibe Aero
From 269,78
FSA SL-K vs. PRO PLT Carbon vs. PRO Vibe Aero
This is what our customers think
Reviews
Pros
Light weight |
Comfort |
Style |
QUALITY |
DESIGN |
RIGIDITY |
Very convenient x me,who use FSA New ErgoCarbon. |
Weight (7x) |
Design (4x) |
Light (3x) |
Rigid (2x) |
Cons
-
Nn is definitely not among the + light |
short |
Little space to mount accessories |
Somewhat difficult to guide cables inside ear |
Mounting was a bit more difficult with the wires through. |
Mounting accessories differently |
According to the product specialist
Pros
-
| These bars are light weight with a high level of stiffness. |
| On these bars the shifters are at a comfortable distance. |
| Choose between traditional, round or flat, ergonomic tops. |
| A drop of 130mm means you can sit extra deep in the drops. |
| The handlebars enable you to hide your Di2 junction inside. |
| Less drag thanks to the aerodynamic design. |
| Fitted with a cable guiding system so the cables are routed away nicely. |
Cons
-
| These bars don't offer internal cable routing. |
| Routing the cables internally takes a little more work. |
Specifications
36 cm
38 cm
40 cm
42 cm
44 cm
46 cm
38 cm
40 cm
42 cm
44 cm
46 cm
40 cm
42 cm
42 cm
125 mm
120 mm
130 mm
130 mm
130 mm
80 mm
68 mm
80 mm
38 cm
40 cm
42 cm
44 cm
40 cm
42 cm
44 cm
40 cm
42 cm
42 cm
Diameter
31.8 mm
31.8 mm
31.8 mm
Weight
235 grams
235 grams
245 grams
Round
Ergonomic
Round
Round
Aero
Compact
Compact
Compact
Material
Carbon
Carbon
Carbon
Colour
Red
Grey
Grey
Black
Black
No
No
Yes
Best
Best
Race & Performance
Recreational cycling
Recreational cycling
Race & Performance
2°
0°
+9 mm
36.9 cm
38.9 cm
40.9 cm
42.9 cm
44.9 cm
46.9 cm
38.9 cm
40.9 cm
42.9 cm
44.9 cm
46.9 cm